I am noticing the same problems when upgrading to 6.0.26 from 6.0.18. I am currently using Richfaces and Tomahawk components for JSF 1.2.
Is there a bug open for this behavior? -----Original Message----- From: Martin Dubuc [mailto:martind1...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:22 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Issues with Tomcat 6.0.26 I am running into same issue on my side using the latest Tomcat 6.0.26 and JSF. I am using Mojarra 1.2 patch 14 and RichFaces 3.3.2 SR1. I didn't have any issues with 6.0.24. Not sure what changed in 6.0.26, but it might have broken JSF 1.2 support. Hopefully, someone can recommend a workaround. Martin On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Sai Pullabhotla < sai.pullabho...@jmethods.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply, Konstantin. > > If I understood your question correctly, you are asking about the > headers in the taglib for richfaces. I pulled it from the jar file and > here it is: > > <taglib xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_1.xsd"; > xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"; > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; version="2.1"> > > which appears to be JSP 2.1. > > Just so you know, we do not have these issues running under Tomcat > 6.0.18. In 6.0.24 we just have one issue which is the bug# 48627. > > With 6.0.26, these new issues popped up. Any insight is greatly > appreciated. > > > Thanks & Regards, > Sai Pullabhotla > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Konstantin Kolinko > <knst.koli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2010/3/12 Sai Pullabhotla <sai.pullabho...@jmethods.com>: > >> <rich:tab label="#{bundle.tabQuickLinks}"> > >> <h:commandLink action="browseProjects" title="#{node.longDescription}" > >> styleClass="#{node.selected ? 'SelectedCategoryNode' : > >> 'CategoryNode'}" actionListener="#{categoryTree.nodeClicked}"> > >> > > > > What versions of the said libraries you are using? > > > > The TLD files for rich: and h: prefixes -- what JSP specification > > version they are using? > > It must be 2.1, not 2.0 > > > > Best regards, > > Konstantin Kolinko > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4940 (20100312) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4940 (20100312) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
