-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian,
On 9/17/2010 7:00 AM, Brian McBride wrote: > My interpretation is still that 2109 defines the > behaviour of Set-Cookie and 2965 that of Set-Cookie2 and that the intent > was that Set-Cookie2 should obsolete Set-Cookie, i.e. 2109 still defines > the behaviour of Set-Cookie. +1 That's the beauty of backward-compatibility, market inertia, and and the never-ending string of RFCs you have to read to figure out just what the hell is really going on. > I presume the behaviour of > Set-Cookie2 is not backwards compatible with that of Set-Cookie and > hence the introduction of a new header. Exactly. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyTnycACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PA3+ACfXRVr0xsEiXUMRE0UAH1j6dEy FlwAn1pQMNHfGkI9NKJKQH/uUgmXkacB =XI/U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
