> From: Pid <p...@pidster.com> > > On 12/2/10 10:24 PM, Justin Case wrote: > > Yeah I probably will do that - but I will still regard it as a dirty hack... > > A ROOT app should be mandatory.
It's not - yet :) so I'm all legal without. But what do you think about the 400 error? Is it really appropriate as answer in this setup? And is it really my particular need to write an application only to convert the 400 into 404? I'm just surprised... ...or maybe I should consider whether my application can be both root AND answer to the context... Cheers, JC --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org