> From: Pid <p...@pidster.com>
>
> On 12/2/10 10:24 PM, Justin Case wrote:
> > Yeah I probably will do that - but I will still regard it as a dirty
hack...
>
> A ROOT app should be mandatory.
It's not - yet :) so I'm all legal without. But what do you think about the 400
error? Is it really appropriate as answer in this setup? And is it really my
particular need to write an application only to convert the 400 into 404? I'm
just surprised...
...or maybe I should consider whether my application can be both root AND
answer
to the context...
Cheers,
JC
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
