Hallo, --- Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> schrieb am Di, 2.8.2011: >>> The message is correct as stated; when JAVA_HOME is used, it
> >> *must* point to a JDK. If you want a specific JRE, you must set > > > JRE_HOME, not JAVA_HOME. > > > > Well, if JDK is not needed anymore, why bother setting JAVA_HOME, why > > is it mentioned at all ? > Because you have a choice: JRE or JDK. Some people have both. Some only > have one. Hence the choice. Well, I have to accept this opinion. But secretly I would still think that is an obsolete message :) > > > > Why not only to set JRE_HOME ?!? > > > > > > Sorry, I can't parse that question. > > > > I meant, if JDK is not needed anymore, why at all mentioning JAVA_HOME ? > > It is not /required/, but it is an option Thanks .
