Thank you - we figured it out.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mark,
>
> On 10/14/2011 11:15 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:33:28AM -0700, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:52 AM, ettoregia <ettore...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> My system: Linux, the version I'don't know how to realize,
> >>> since I've got just an ssh connection and typing some command
> >>> I've not been able to discover it, maybe you can help me out
> >>> on this as well.
> >>
> >> `cat /proc/version` should give you something useful.
> >
> > 'uname -a' is another possibility.
>
> I'm running Debian Squeeze:
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux dev 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 #1 SMP Wed May 18 23:53:57 UTC 2011
> i686 GNU/Linux
>
> No mention of Debian.
>
> $ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-34squeeze1)
> (da...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 SMP Wed
> May 18 23:53:57 UTC 2011
>
> Ooh, Debian everywhere.
>
> Looks like Hassan's suggestion is better.
>
> I usually do:
>
> $ cat /etc/issue
> Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 \n \l
>
> I didn't know there was a /proc/version. Maybe I'll start using that,
> as it has more information.
>
> > This I can agree with.  They don't allow application managers
> > access to Tomcat's config., but anyone can drop stuff into
> > /etc/init.d, whence it will run as root?  Really?  Something is
> > not right here.
>
> Technically, things in /etc/init.d don't run as root just because they
> are there. Most rc.d-based systems use /etc/rc[runlevel].d/* as
> startup scripts, and those are symlinked to /etc/init.d. Putting a
> file into /etc/init.d isn't a direct exploit, but it's pretty close.
>
> > That init script would need to start Yet Another Tomcat Instance.
> > Is that what IT wants?  That has implications for memory demand,
> > port and address space, and linking among app.s.  Maybe the IT guy
> > understands how Tomcat works, but I think I would explore the
> > possibility that he doesn't.
>
> +1
>
> - -chris
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk6cgVAACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDETACgorbI/rr9VyrqW8Be2FWgBthm
> gIEAn0pPW7uw5nsS2Zl8y8EjwFr2A+CY
> =Ehot
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to