On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote: > On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed between .35 and >> .36 >> > > OK, but if you follow the recommended configuration > by making sure that workers which are members of lb are not > listed inside worker.list, does it works? > >
The question is, is this a recommendation or a restriction that should be enforced? Maybe a warning about this, apparently common, [mis-]configuration should be issued at module configuration time? Cheers Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
