> On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote: > > > > > > I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed between .35 and > > .36 > > > > OK, but if you follow the recommended configuration > by making sure that workers which are members of lb are not > listed inside worker.list, does it works?
If I take the worker out of the worker list, then the loadbalancer works. But then accessing the worker by itself it doesn't. It seems to be based on the worker.list ordering Here's the behavior: worker.list=jkstatus,app-03,loadbalancer loadbalancer: does NOT work (503) app-03: works worker.list=jkstatus,loadbalancer,app-03 loadbalancer: works app-03: does NOT work (503) worker.list=jkstatus,loadbalancer loadbalancer: works app-03: does NOT work (500) -Tony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
