i'd say yes...and no. JMS (1) does not guarantee anything about the protocol so hard to get an external client
stomp exists in js ;) *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/3/2 James Green <[email protected]> > Why STOMP? > > Our experience is not the greatest with STOMP, we only use it from our PHP > applications. With a JVM language you should consider JMS instead. > > James. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 2 Mar 2013, at 17:18, Bharath <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My web-app is going to receive STOMP messages from a remote ActiveMQ > broker. > > I want to simulate that using a local messaging server for test > purposes. My > > web-app runs on a tomcat container... so the thought of placing ActiveMQ > > along with it and making it send test frames to the local web-app. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-in-TomEE-tp4661143p4661148.html > > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
