I was more interested in ensuring Bharath was aware :-)
On 2 March 2013 17:58, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > i'd say yes...and no. JMS (1) does not guarantee anything about the > protocol so hard to get an external client > > stomp exists in js ;) > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/3/2 James Green <[email protected]> > > > Why STOMP? > > > > Our experience is not the greatest with STOMP, we only use it from our > PHP > > applications. With a JVM language you should consider JMS instead. > > > > James. > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On 2 Mar 2013, at 17:18, Bharath <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > My web-app is going to receive STOMP messages from a remote ActiveMQ > > broker. > > > I want to simulate that using a local messaging server for test > > purposes. My > > > web-app runs on a tomcat container... so the thought of placing > ActiveMQ > > > along with it and making it send test frames to the local web-app. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-in-TomEE-tp4661143p4661148.html > > > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
