Technically yes, then the issue is we need somebody with all perms to release tomee (ping @David?).
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com> > @Romain, not sure to understand the details, but do you mean you may have a > way to release TomEE+ 1.6.0 official release without waiting for the > (unknown) OpenJPA 2.3.0 release? > > Thanks, > Alex > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > I meant forking it for the release "as usual", not using a snapshot which > > wouldn't be professional > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> > > > > > Possible, but I would only release TomEE itself not all modules to > avoid > > > depending on a snapshot. > > > TomEE is different because if the snapshot is available during the > build, > > > which is obviously the case, we can embedded the JAR file in the zip > > file. > > > > > > JLouis > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > technically it is possible > > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, can a TomEE 1.6.0 official release be make with a > snapshot > > > > > OpenJPA 2.3 ? > > > > > > > > > > I'm concerned if we have no visibility > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Would mean reverting some code in openejb + forking openwebbeans > > and > > > > > update > > > > > > the code + accepting to not work in some cases in java 7...so I > > don't > > > > > think > > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > > > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > From OpenJPA's web site: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================================================================= > > > > > > > The 2.x releases <http://openjpa.apache.org/downloads.html> > > (2.2.2 > > > > is > > > > > > the > > > > > > > latest) are a production ready, compliant implementation of the > > > > JSR-317 > > > > > > > Java Persistence 2.0 <http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=317> > > > > > > specification, > > > > > > > which is backwards compatible to the JPA 1.0 specification and > > > passes > > > > > the > > > > > > > Sun JPA 2.0 Technology Compatibility Kit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The upcoming 2.3 release is based off of the 2.2.x release > stream > > > and > > > > > > will > > > > > > > contain some additional features (TBD). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================================================================= > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No way to know when OpenJPA 2.3 could be available. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can't we have a TomEE 1.6.0 release based on OpenJPA 2.2.2 > which > > is > > > > > > already > > > > > > > TCK compliant, and leave OpenJPA 2.3 for a future TomEE > release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Alex: 2.3.0, there are working on it but want to address few > > > > > blocking > > > > > > > > issues before AFAIK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > > > > > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > > > > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > > > > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Romain: which OpenJPA release are you waiting to make > TomEE > > > > 1.6.0 > > > > > > > > > generally available, and what is this OpenJPA release's > > > schedule? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:01 AM, zmirc <m_chi...@yahoo.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would really want to know that, too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/1-6-0-release-plans-tp4665437p4665447.html > > > > > > > > > > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at > > > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > >
