yup, gonna start with cutting the actual release in a few hours. The next projects on the list are xbean and OpenWebBeans.
LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 17:14 > Subject: Re: 1.6.0 release plans? > > Hi > > OpenJPA release work started, Jira are almost closed and the release > should start soon > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > 2013/10/29 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >> Hello TomEE team, >> >> Would you please update us with TomEE 1.6.0 official release? >> For example, was the action mentionned by jean-Louis on OpenJPA done? >> When is planned something like an official beta or "release > candidate" ? >> >> Thanks, >> Alex. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > <jeano...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> First, push an official mail on OpenJPA mailling list asking for a > 2.3.0 >>> release. Waiting an answer within the usual 72 hours for example. >>> If no answer or no way to get a release by October 20th or so (I > don't >>> care), then fork it internally as we did sometimes in the past and > start >>> releasing TomEE by end of November. >>> >>> That means more or less that we must freeze/finalize all on-going >>> development by October the 15th I think. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Jean-Louis >>> >>> >>> 2013/10/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>> >>> > Technically yes, then the issue is we need somebody with all perms > to >>> > release tomee (ping @David?). >>> > >>> > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >>> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com> >>> > >>> > > @Romain, not sure to understand the details, but do you mean > you may >>> > have a >>> > > way to release TomEE+ 1.6.0 official release without waiting > for the >>> > > (unknown) OpenJPA 2.3.0 release? >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > Alex >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> > rmannibu...@gmail.com >>> > > >wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > I meant forking it for the release "as usual", > not using a snapshot >>> > which >>> > > > wouldn't be professional >>> > > > >>> > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>> > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >>> > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>> > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > 2013/10/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> >>> > > > >>> > > > > Possible, but I would only release TomEE itself not > all modules to >>> > > avoid >>> > > > > depending on a snapshot. >>> > > > > TomEE is different because if the snapshot is > available during the >>> > > build, >>> > > > > which is obviously the case, we can embedded the > JAR file in the >>> zip >>> > > > file. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > JLouis >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > 2013/10/8 Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > technically it is possible >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>> > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >>> > > > > > *Blog: > **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>> > > > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>> > > > > > *LinkedIn: > **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>> > > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker > <alex.m3...@gmail.com> >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Otherwise, can a TomEE 1.6.0 official > release be make with a >>> > > snapshot >>> > > > > > > OpenJPA 2.3 ? >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > I'm concerned if we have no > visibility >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Thanks, >>> > > > > > > Alex >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Romain > Manni-Bucau < >>> > > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com >>> > > > > > > >wrote: >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Would mean reverting some code in > openejb + forking >>> > openwebbeans >>> > > > and >>> > > > > > > update >>> > > > > > > > the code + accepting to not work in > some cases in java >>> 7...so I >>> > > > don't >>> > > > > > > think >>> > > > > > > > so. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>> > > > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >>> > > > > > > > *Blog: > **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>> > > > > > > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>> > > > > > > > *LinkedIn: > **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>> > > > > > > > *Github: > https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker > <alex.m3...@gmail.com> >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > From OpenJPA's web site: >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > ============================================================================= >>> > > > > > > > > The 2.x releases > <http://openjpa.apache.org/downloads.html >>> > >>> > > > (2.2.2 >>> > > > > > is >>> > > > > > > > the >>> > > > > > > > > latest) are a production ready, > compliant implementation of >>> > the >>> > > > > > JSR-317 >>> > > > > > > > > Java Persistence 2.0 > <http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=317> >>> > > > > > > > specification, >>> > > > > > > > > which is backwards compatible > to the JPA 1.0 specification >>> > and >>> > > > > passes >>> > > > > > > the >>> > > > > > > > > Sun JPA 2.0 Technology > Compatibility Kit. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > The upcoming 2.3 release is > based off of the 2.2.x release >>> > > stream >>> > > > > and >>> > > > > > > > will >>> > > > > > > > > contain some additional > features (TBD). >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > ============================================================================= >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > No way to know when OpenJPA 2.3 > could be available. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Can't we have a TomEE 1.6.0 > release based on OpenJPA 2.2.2 >>> > > which >>> > > > is >>> > > > > > > > already >>> > > > > > > > > TCK compliant, and leave > OpenJPA 2.3 for a future TomEE >>> > > release? >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Thanks, >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Alex >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:21 PM, > Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> > > > > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com >>> > > > > > > > > >wrote: >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > @Alex: 2.3.0, there are > working on it but want to address >>> > few >>> > > > > > > blocking >>> > > > > > > > > > issues before AFAIK >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>> > > > > > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau >>> >* >>> > > > > > > > > > *Blog: > **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>> > > > > > > > > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>> > > > > > > > > > *LinkedIn: > **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>> > > > > > > > > > *Github: > https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker > <alex.m3...@gmail.com> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > @Romain: which > OpenJPA release are you waiting to make >>> > > TomEE >>> > > > > > 1.6.0 >>> > > > > > > > > > > generally available, > and what is this OpenJPA release's >>> > > > > schedule? >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, >>> > > > > > > > > > > Alex >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 > at 11:01 AM, zmirc < >>> > m_chi...@yahoo.com >>> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > I would really > want to know that, too. >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > -- >>> > > > > > > > > > > > View this > message in context: >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/1-6-0-release-plans-tp4665437p4665447.html >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from the > OpenEJB User mailing list archive at >>> > > > > Nabble.com. >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > Jean-Louis >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Louis >>> >
