Hmm with validation query and eviction configured it should wirk, maybe screenshit the jmx config Le 13 févr. 2014 21:48, "José Luis Cetina" <maxtorz...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Sorry i copy/paste the same values, here are again > > Now: 14:46 > In server 1, now is in 95 > In server 2, now is in 63 lets see if after a while it decrease. > > At: 13:08 hrs > > In server 1, now is in 77 > In server 2, now is in 40 lets see if after a while it decrease. > > What could be happening? > > > 2014-02-13 14:47 GMT-06:00 José Luis Cetina <maxtorz...@gmail.com>: > > > @Romain the size of the datasource still growing: > > > > > > Now: 14:46 > > In server 1, now is in 77 > > In server 2, now is in 40 lets see if after a while it decrease. > > > > At: 13:08 hrs > > > > In server 1, now is in 77 > > In server 2, now is in 40 lets see if after a while it decrease. > > > > What could be happening? > > > > > > > > 2014-02-13 14:42 GMT-06:00 José Luis Cetina <maxtorz...@gmail.com>: > > > > The apps are running GREAT!! i will share what is my infraestructure: > >> > >> 1 Apache Server at front (configure with workers for tomee instances) > >> 1 Database server with mysql (All the resources are available just for > >> mysql) > >> 2 Tomee server for production (they do DB operations to database server, > >> here i have all the available resource just for TomEE) > >> 1 Tomee server for testing and jira issue tracker > >> > >> All of them running great, my server are intel i5 with 16gb of ram with > >> debian 6. > >> > >> My app is an ear, with 6 webapps and 3 own libraries + 1 ejb module, > >> today i reach to 450 users from only 1 weeek. The app has more than 650 > >> user's, by the way the mainly app has only 1 week at the web and is > >> responding well, the only problem that i had is that the pull get > empty, i > >> get that error just today. From yesterday to today we get just 200 new > >> users and they are interacting with any other issue. > >> > >> What i can see is that the active connections still growing it just time > >> to reach the limite (500) but im monitoring, i will let you know. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> 2014-02-13 14:29 GMT-06:00 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com > >: > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:21 AM, José Luis Cetina < > maxtorz...@gmail.com > >>> >wrote: > >>> > >>> > I use 2 servers with this configuration and tomee and both of them > >>> read to > >>> > other server where the database is (2 webapp server + 1 db server). > >>> > > >>> > >>> with your current config, have (180) endusers reported performance > >>> feedback? web page (database) transactions seems to be fast/responsive, > >>> no-wait, few seconds wait for most transactions? > >>> > >>> when you changed max active from 250 to 500, any better (or different) > >>> feedback from endusers of your app? > >>> > >>> i don't have 180 (concurrent) users (or connections), but i have > tweaked > >>> those jdbc resource settings a few times. I think, my last change was > >>> from > >>> higher number to lower number, and app performs well. app always > >>> performed > >>> well, but i don't think i've seen difference in performance when jdbc > >>> resource settings were tweaked. > >>> > >>> there is something that I recognized recently. for some time, there was > >>> one > >>> page that retrieved data from database via @Stateless, and the data was > >>> not > >>> the latest-and-greatest data. Recently, I did some transactions in the > >>> app > >>> (on other pages), and opened that page, and it seems to > work-as-expected > >>> 'now' (finally). I think the latest change to my app was tomee 1.6.1 > >>> snapshot, but i think it had something to do with @Stateless EJBs and > the > >>> jdbc connections. seem as though app was reusing a pooled connection > and > >>> it > >>> did not get the latest data, but glad it's working as expected now. > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> *José Luis Cetina* > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *José Luis Cetina* > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > *José Luis Cetina* > ------------------------------------------------------------------- >
