2014-10-06 8:38 GMT+02:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <itsme...@gmail.com>: > @Romain > > - Do I not need to use @Inject for EJB if I need to use CDI Interceptors on > the EJB?
no > - When I use @Inject where can the EJB I try to inject be packaged? Same > WAR, EJB-JAR inside same EAR, other WAR in same EAR, other EAR? > same as classloader rules in theory. > Regards > LF > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Well rule is simple: for @Stateless/@Singleton if CDI is enabled >> (beans.xml) @Inject = @EJB. For @Stateful @Inject only makes sense >> with a normal scope and here cdi handles the stateful lifecycle (no >> need to call @Remove). >> >> @EJB doesn't for for remote ejb excepted using TomEE specific feature >> like JndiProvider (often you use a @Produces externalizing the jndi >> properties). >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2014-10-03 17:19 GMT+02:00 Alex Soto <asot...@gmail.com>: >> > It is never late to know sth new. But then if this is TomEE specific your >> > are tight to TomEE and won t be able to run on wildfly fir example >> > >> > El divendres, 3 octubre de 2014, hwaastad <he...@waastad.org> va >> escriure: >> > >> >> ...or use @inject all over and produce your remotes :-) >> >> >> >> br hw >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Regarding-Inject-vs-EJB-for-EJB-tp4672108p4672117.html >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Enviat amb Gmail Mobile >> > > > > -- > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > immediately at itsme...@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this > message and any attachments.