it should yes
Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-10-06 9:13 GMT+02:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <itsme...@gmail.com>: > @Romain > > Thanks.... is @EJB with CDI-interceptors working for any App server that is > JEE6 compatible or is it a TomEE feature? > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 2014-10-06 8:38 GMT+02:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <itsme...@gmail.com>: >> > @Romain >> > >> > - Do I not need to use @Inject for EJB if I need to use CDI Interceptors >> on >> > the EJB? >> >> no >> >> > - When I use @Inject where can the EJB I try to inject be packaged? Same >> > WAR, EJB-JAR inside same EAR, other WAR in same EAR, other EAR? >> > >> >> same as classloader rules in theory. >> >> > Regards >> > LF >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Well rule is simple: for @Stateless/@Singleton if CDI is enabled >> >> (beans.xml) @Inject = @EJB. For @Stateful @Inject only makes sense >> >> with a normal scope and here cdi handles the stateful lifecycle (no >> >> need to call @Remove). >> >> >> >> @EJB doesn't for for remote ejb excepted using TomEE specific feature >> >> like JndiProvider (often you use a @Produces externalizing the jndi >> >> properties). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-10-03 17:19 GMT+02:00 Alex Soto <asot...@gmail.com>: >> >> > It is never late to know sth new. But then if this is TomEE specific >> your >> >> > are tight to TomEE and won t be able to run on wildfly fir example >> >> > >> >> > El divendres, 3 octubre de 2014, hwaastad <he...@waastad.org> va >> >> escriure: >> >> > >> >> >> ...or use @inject all over and produce your remotes :-) >> >> >> >> >> >> br hw >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Regarding-Inject-vs-EJB-for-EJB-tp4672108p4672117.html >> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Enviat amb Gmail Mobile >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >> > >> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> > >> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >> > The information contained in this electronic message and any >> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> > immediately at itsme...@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this >> > message and any attachments. >> > > > > -- > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > immediately at itsme...@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this > message and any attachments.
