Thought that the provided scope wouldn't interfere on tests. My idea with the javax.faces-api was to avoid compilation problems, as in production MyFaces libs are inside TomEE lib folder.
Another pitfall is that I thought that Mojarra api dependency would be this: <dependency> <groupId>com.sun.faces</groupId> <artifactId>jsf-api</artifactId> <version>2.2.12</version> </dependency> Glad it's working now, thanks. 2015-12-08 11:11 GMT-02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > Sure you use myfaces api? ;) > > <dependency> > <groupId>javax.faces</groupId> > <artifactId>javax.faces-api</artifactId> > <version>2.2</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > > should be > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core</groupId> > <artifactId>myfaces-api</artifactId> > <version>2.2.8</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > > > JSF is a spec where the API chan't be exchanged between implementations. > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-12-08 12:37 GMT+01:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjae...@gmail.com>: > > > Done: https://github.com/fkjaekel/CdiViewScopeTest > > > > Thanks for your time > > > > 2015-12-08 7:38 GMT-02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > > > > +1 for a sample please. Then it will be pretty easy to identify your > > > problem. > > > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > Am 07.12.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > >: > > > > > > > > Myfaces API pick up the proxy map implementation in a hardcoded > > fashion. > > > I > > > > dont see if you have the right classpath how it can fail this way. > Can > > > you > > > > push to github your project to try to reproduce it there? > > > > > > > > > > > > >
