Quick note - I'm aware of this question and I couple of others you've asked, and I'm definitely not ignoring them. I don't know the answer off the top of my head and will need to check code and I have a long TODO list - I hope you understand.
If someone else can beat me to answering, that's great, thank you. Jon On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:30 AM COURTAULT Francois < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Is there someone to answer to this question: " Could you confirm that if > we haven't this entry in the system.properties or set to none then all MP > specifications are disabled at runtime ? " > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: COURTAULT Francois > Sent: mercredi 12 février 2020 11:13 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption > > Hello Jonathan, > > JIRA ticket created: TOMEE-2771 > > If you can answer to the following question(already asked in the ticket) : > Could you confirm that if we haven't this entry in the system.properties or > set to none then all MP specifications are disabled et runtime ? > It should be fine. > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: COURTAULT Francois [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: mercredi 12 février 2020 09:51 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption > > Hello Jonathan > > I will do so (Jira). > BTW, is this property tomee.mp.scan documented somewhere ? > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Gallimore [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: mardi 11 février 2020 19:25 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: TomEE microprofile memory consumption > > Awesome, thanks for the feedback. We'd still want to fix the actual issue. > If you get time, if you can file a JIRA, that would be great. > > Jon > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:01 PM COURTAULT Francois < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Jonathan, > > > > We did the test (remove tomee.mp.scan = all entry in > > system.properties) with TomEE MP and it solves the issue we have: a > > lot of opentracing objects created. > > We don't have this issue (a lot of opentracing objects created) in > > TomEE Plus because this entry doesn't exist in system.properties !!! > > > > Best Regards. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: COURTAULT Francois > > Sent: mardi 11 février 2020 10:32 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption > > > > Hello Jonathan, > > > > As I have mentioned, we see the issue in TomEE MP but not in TomEE Plus ! > > So I did a comparison of the 2 flavors: lib + conf > > > > The only difference I have seen is in the system.properties where I > > have the line below in TomEE MP and not this one in TomEE Plus ! > > This could explain. We will try to remove this line to see if it > > solves the memory issue we have and will let you know. > > > > Best Regards. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jonathan Gallimore [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: lundi 10 février 2020 23:14 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: TomEE microprofile memory consumption > > > > Allow me start over, if I may. > > > > What are you seeing in your memory dumps that's a concern - a large > > number of ScopeImpl objects? Could you provide some screenshots from > > VisualVM for us? I'd be interested in object counts, and whether there > > are references, and if so, what they are. > > > > The TaskThread comes from Tomcat. It being present doesn't sound like > > an issue, but I appreciate you've asked because you have some concern > > - can you provide some more context? > > > > > You didn't answer to this question: Is there a way to disable > > > opentracing > > in TomEE MP ? Is it possible ? > > > > Its a setting in the Geronimo OpenTracing project: > > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-opentracing. Try setting > > geronimo.opentracing.filter.active to false (an entry in > > conf/system.properties should do the trick). > > > > Jon > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 6:46 PM COURTAULT Francois < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello Jonathan, > > > > > > Quite complex for us what you ask for. > > > > > > BTW, have you any idea about this > > > org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread in the memory dump we have. > > > Where could it come from ? > > > > > > You didn't answer to this question: Is there a way to disable > > > opentracing in TomEE MP ? Is it possible ? > > > > > > Best Regards. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jonathan Gallimore [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: lundi 10 février 2020 18:21 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: TomEE microprofile memory consumption > > > > > > > I can provide you some memory dumps if you want . > > > > > > Some details on how to reproduce with a small sample would be helpful. > > > Memory dumps tend to be quite large and contain confidential > > > information, so we prefer to not exchange those on the list. > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 5:10 PM COURTAULT Francois < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > We have 2 microservices: one using TomEE Plus and the other using > > > > TomEE > > > MP. > > > > These 2 µS don't use at all OpenTracing features: no @Trace .... > > > > We have no memory issue with the µS using TomEE Plus. This is > > > > strange because TomEE Plus somehow is a superset of TomEE MP. > > > > > > > > The issue is due to the usage of > > > > org.apache.geronimo.microprofile.opentracing.impl.ScopeImpl but we > > > > don't know what trigger that usage. > > > > We also see a lot of org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread > > > > (don't know where it comes from) which uses the above ScopeImpl. > > > > > > > > I can provide you some memory dumps if you want . > > > > > > > > Is there a way to disable opentracing in TomEE MP ? > > > > > > > > Best Regards. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
