Adam,
Which disk usage is higher? Cache disk or logging disk?
On 06/24/2011 02:06 AM, Adam Jefferiss wrote:
Hi all,
I've been using web-polygraph[1] to run some performance tests through
traffic server 3.0 and have noticed that compared to 2.0.1 the disk
usage is considerably higher on average, for example one run has 2.0.1
marked down at 18% disk usage on average while 3.0 is up to 50%.
I've got logging set to errors only to test to see if the transaction
logging was causing the problem, but without much difference between
the two. I've also effectively disabled the cache in storage.conf by
setting the cache size to 0, again without too much of a difference.
Is there anything obvious that I've missed?
We're looking at having traffic server replace our current proxy, but
the disk usage results are causing a few concerns.
Any information you guys you can point me towards would be great.
Thanks,
Adam
[1] http://www.web-polygraph.org
