Hi, Sorry about the late reply, the logging disk usage seems to be running on average higher. Although the cache disk usage does peak the highest.
On 24 June 2011 17:48, Billy Vierra <[email protected]> wrote: > Adam, > Which disk usage is higher? Cache disk or logging disk? > > > On 06/24/2011 02:06 AM, Adam Jefferiss wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've been using web-polygraph[1] to run some performance tests through >> traffic server 3.0 and have noticed that compared to 2.0.1 the disk usage is >> considerably higher on average, for example one run has 2.0.1 marked down at >> 18% disk usage on average while 3.0 is up to 50%. >> >> I've got logging set to errors only to test to see if the transaction >> logging was causing the problem, but without much difference between the >> two. I've also effectively disabled the cache in storage.conf by setting the >> cache size to 0, again without too much of a difference. >> >> Is there anything obvious that I've missed? >> >> We're looking at having traffic server replace our current proxy, but the >> disk usage results are causing a few concerns. >> >> Any information you guys you can point me towards would be great. >> >> Thanks, >> Adam >> >> [1] http://www.web-polygraph.org >> >
