Thanks for the tip! I didn't realize I could just "yum upgrade" myself from CentOS 6.2 up to 6.4.
I'll have to give that a shot once I get everything up and running. On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]>wrote: > i do *not* understand your argumentation > > * if you have a virtual server *you* are the one typing "yum upgrade" > * if you have a managed server demand them to do their job > * why does security not bother somebody these days? > * CentOS 6.3/6.4 are *security* updates > > that's the same someone says "CentOS 5.5 is fine" > no, it is not -> type "yum upgrade" and you are on 5.9 > > Am 13.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Adam W. Dace: > > The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, bandwidth. > > > > I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache for > a while and they are awesome. > > However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config > like crazy in an attempt > > to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of. > > > > I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and > these wonderful people include > > 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their > distro is a little old honestly doesn't bother me. > > > > Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a > virtual machine and give it a shot. :-) > > > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald > > <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > Am 13.10.2013 <tel:13.10.2013> 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace: > > > I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found > a cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my > > > parent web cache. :-) > > > > > > Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was > wondering if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it. > > > > besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?! > > current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it > > is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which > > you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6 > > but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel > > > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2 > > Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800 > > Von: Mohd Akhbar <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Antwort an: [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > > An: [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > > > > Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1 > > -- ____________________________________________________________ Adam W. Dace <[email protected]> Phone: (815) 355-5848 Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451 Microsoft Messenger - [email protected] <[email protected]> Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about
