Thanks James.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:31 AM, James Peach <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 13, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> wrote: > > > i do *not* understand your argumentation > > > > * if you have a virtual server *you* are the one typing "yum upgrade" > > * if you have a managed server demand them to do their job > > * why does security not bother somebody these days? > > * CentOS 6.3/6.4 are *security* updates > > > > that's the same someone says "CentOS 5.5 is fine" > > no, it is not -> type "yum upgrade" and you are on 5.9 > > Let's not get off-topic here. > > Adam, we don't have a CentOS 6.2 build bot, but we support 5.x and 6.x. I > think that you will be fine. > > J > > > > > Am 13.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Adam W. Dace: > >> The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, > bandwidth. > >> > >> I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache > for a while and they are awesome. > >> However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config > like crazy in an attempt > >> to avoid -any- video going across the Internet. It sucks kind of. > >> > >> I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and > these wonderful people include > >> 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost. That their > distro is a little old honestly doesn't bother me. > >> > >> Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a > virtual machine and give it a shot. :-) > >> > >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald > >> <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Am 13.10.2013 <tel:13.10.2013> 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace: > >>> I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a > cheaper alternative to Rackspace to host my > >>> parent web cache. :-) > >>> > >>> Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was > wondering if anyone's compiled / tested ATS on it. > >> > >> besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?! > >> current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it > >> is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which > >> you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6 > >> but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel > >> > >> > >> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > >> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2 > >> Datum: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800 > >> Von: Mohd Akhbar <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> Antwort an: [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > >> An: [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > >> > >> Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1 > > > > -- ____________________________________________________________ Adam W. Dace <[email protected]> Phone: (815) 355-5848 Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451 Microsoft Messenger - [email protected] <[email protected]> Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about
