Am 18.10.2013 18:40, schrieb Adam W. Dace: > Yeah, I'm not trying to debate that filesystem is faster than raw disk. It's > just not really an option for me. > Heck, one of the caches I'm running is completely virtualized. Sorry, no raw > disk there
uhm? [root@proxy:~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep hypervisor flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts nopl xtopology tsc_reliable nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat epb pln pts dtherm hypervisor = VMware vSphere 5 guest our whole infrastructure is 100% virtualized including the ATS machine but i see no reason why you can't avoid the guest-FS and assign the virtual disk dedicated to ATS in case of virtualization it is even more important to avoid the additional filesystem layer because there are enough layers with latency (guest, host, SAN)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
