I'm essentially leasing a virtual machine on the cheap, and I didn't see any such option from the company I'm hosting it with.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]>wrote: > Am 18.10.2013 18:40, schrieb Adam W. Dace: > > Yeah, I'm not trying to debate that filesystem is faster than raw disk. > It's just not really an option for me. > > Heck, one of the caches I'm running is completely virtualized. Sorry, no > raw disk there > > uhm? > > [root@proxy:~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep hypervisor > flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat > pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 > ss syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts nopl xtopology > tsc_reliable nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni > pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat > epb pln pts dtherm > > hypervisor = VMware vSphere 5 guest > > our whole infrastructure is 100% virtualized including the ATS machine > but i see no reason why you can't avoid the guest-FS and assign the > virtual disk dedicated to ATS > > in case of virtualization it is even more important to avoid the > additional filesystem layer because there are enough layers with > latency (guest, host, SAN) > > > > > -- ____________________________________________________________ Adam W. Dace <[email protected]> Phone: (815) 355-5848 Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451 Microsoft Messenger - [email protected] <[email protected]> Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about
