it is obscure but it still should be possible. anyway, you can discuss it
here if you like. for example you can list some pros and cons that you think
the current approach has.
-igor
On 8/15/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> If you believe that the usecase is obscure, shouldn't this approach to be
> reconsidered? Or at least discussed a little bit more, before the final
> release is done?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
> >
> > i believe it was jonathan who had an obscure usecase that null input was
> > supposed to be converted to a nonnull object.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 8/14/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I found a quick fix for my issue: instead of disabling the Textfield, I
> >> make
> >> it readonly... still wondering why the change has been made in the
> >> convert()
> >> method.
> >>
> >>
> >> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > At this point I don't know why the check was removed, but i suppose
> >> > there was a reason for it. I'm not sure whether we should support the
> >> > state when client and server are out of sync.
> >> >
> >> > -Matej
> >> >
> >> > On 8/14/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> This means that the component enable state must be always in sync
> with
> >> >> the
> >> >> client side state? Shouldn't it be set automatically as not enabled
> >> after
> >> >> the submit occurs? On the other hand, the same code worked great on
> >> the
> >> >> wicket-1.2.x branch..
> >> >>
> >> >> Please help!
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'm not sure if it's bug in wicket. So your <input> is disabled,
> but
> >> >> > the TextField component is not? That's not good, you need to
> disable
> >> >> > the TextField too in that case.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -Matej
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 8/14/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> After migrating from wicket-1.2.6 to wicket-1.3.0-beta2 I had the
> >> >> >> following
> >> >> >> problem:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> application throws ConversionException when trying to convert a
> >> null
> >> >> >> value
> >> >> >> of the Textfield wich is disabled on the clientside.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I've take a look on the convert() method of the FormComponent
> class
> >> >> and
> >> >> >> noticed the difference from the 1.2.x branch which may cause the
> >> >> issue:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This snippet of code is from 1.3.0-beta2
> >> >> >> [CODE]
> >> >> >> if (typeName == null) {
> >> >> >> //string conversion code
> >> >> >> } else {
> >> >> >> //type conversion code
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >> [/CODE]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This snippet of code is from 1.2.6
> >> >> >> [CODE]
> >> >> >> if (type == null) {
> >> >> >> //string conversion code
> >> >> >> } else if (!Strings.isEmpty(getInput())) {
> >> >> >> //type conversion code
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >> [/CODE]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> As you can see, in the 1.3.0-beta2 version, the conversion does
> not
> >> >> check
> >> >> >> if
> >> >> >> the getInput() is an empty string before performing type
> >> conversion.
> >> I
> >> >> >> wonder if it is a bug, or it is something that I missed?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thank you!
> >> >> >> Alex
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-1.3-beta2-validation-%28conversion%29-bug--tf4265733.html#a12140062
> >> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-1.3-beta2-validation-%28conversion%29-bug--tf4265733.html#a12141596
> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-1.3-beta2-validation-%28conversion%29-bug--tf4265733.html#a12157292
> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-1.3-beta2-validation-%28conversion%29-bug--tf4265733.html#a12175844
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
