Hi Nino,

at the moment I don't want to compare Ajax so in the applications I
wrote for testing it's not used.

Sure, I will post the results here... probably the next week...

Attached the JMeter scripts I wrote (it would be better only one
script but at the moment the urls used are different). I will post
them also in the JMeter user list.


Thanks,
V.

On 8/24/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's looking okay, did you pick up the thing mentioned on the wiki?
>
> You are not using ajax in Spring MVC? It would be wrong to just plain
> compare non ajax to ajax..
>
> Also you could write to the Jmeter list, to get a broader view of your
> test plan.
>
> Also you'll post results here ?
>
> regards Nino
>
> Vincenzo Vitale wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > any performance comparison out there between Spring MVC and Wicket?
> >
> >
> > I do want to convince people I'm working with to use Wicket for the
> > next presentation projects but someone has concerns about the session
> > usage and performances with Ajax.
> >
> > There are a lot of post in which is explained this is not a problem
> > and for example I know using Detachable models is the first best
> > practice for the first problem but I want to show numbers to my
> > colleagues... :-)
> >
> > To compare the memory usage performance I wrote the same simple
> > application in Wicket (Detachable Models used) and Spring MVC. Both
> > are using the same service layer (Spring + Hibernate) to retrieve
> > objects from the db; in the applications there are two stateless
> > pages: the first one is just a list page without pagination and the
> > second one is a detail page.
> >
> > In the database there are 50 elements and I wrote a JMeter script in
> > which a request for each page is done (a CookieManager is used to
> > create always a new session) , 10 threads are used with 1 sec of ramp
> > up and 20 loops per threads. Each application is deployed "alone" in a
> > JBoss instance.
> > Then I launch the Jmeter script and use JConsole for the memory analysis.
> >
> > Something wrong with this? Any Suggestions (more elements in the db,
> > more threads, more something...)?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> > Vicio.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to