Gwyn Evans wrote:
Probably fairly soon - we've been looking at the changes and
discussing it on the dev list, to try & get an idea if it'll cause a
significant delay with regards to the aim of getting a 1.3 release out
ASAP. Currently, however, I think the view is that it'll be likely to
be in and we'll do a beta4, then see how it looks.
I think I saw some comment about some rebuilding work of Ate's house -
I don't know any more than that, but if he's quiet for a bit, that
might explain it!
Although that is going to take some of my time away the next 3 months, I still
be online/able to answer questions normally on a daily basis :)
In the meantime, you could get the baseline code from SVN
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/tags/wicket-1.3.0-beta3),
apply the patch from the jira issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12366048/wicket-1.3.0-beta3-portlet-support.patch
and build your own copy if you want to have a look prior to that.
(Build with tests disabled "mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true install" as the
patch missed changing a particular test expectation)
I've just committed a fix for that test case.
Sorry I missed it out but then it didn't fail on me on my own machine (weird!).
Ate
/Gwyn
On Thursday, September 20, 2007, 10:20:23 AM, Dipu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ate,
I'm interested in the portlet support which you have implemented in wicket.
Any idea when it might be merged into the trunk?
Regards
Dipu
On 9/17/07, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm really happy to announce that a new and quite feature complete Wicket
Portlets Demo is now available for download at:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/wicket/jetspeed-2.1.3-dev-wicket-demo-installer.jar
I've worked hard the last few weeks to improve the Wicket portlet support
branch and it can now run all Wicket Examples natively as portlet!
See also IRA issue WICKET-658 at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-658#action_12528082 where I
have provided more information how to install and use
this demo.
Although there probably are still some minor issues here and there, the
demo will show that portlet development using Wicket is now very much
feasible.
I'd like to invite anyone interested to try out the demo and see it in
action for yourself, and of course please report any encountered
issue/problems to the
dev list.
I've developed the portlet support based on the 1.3.0-beta3 release (with
few minor bugfixes ported back from the trunk), so although the trunk
development has
progressed at it usual aggressive speed, updating the portlet-support to
the latest Wicket trunk shouldn't be too much work (that is: right now!).
As we would like to start using Wicket for a rewrite of the Jetspeed-2
administration portlets *now*, it would be great if the portlet support can
be
incorporated into the trunk as soon as possible. Delaying this until after
the 1.3.0 release would mean being out-of-sync with the main wicket trunk
development
all the time and a lot of work each time we want/need to bring it back in
sync.
Initially, back in May this year, my idea was waiting with merging the
portlet support in the trunk to after the 1.3.0 release.
But as 1.3.0 still isn't released yet and still in beta phase, it would be
much better to merge now otherwise the portlet-support will be constantly
out-of-sync
with the main wicket trunk development, causing a lot of effort each time
we want (or need) to bring it back in sync.
For Jetspeed-2, we would very much like to start using Wicket for a
rewrite of the Jetspeed-2 administration portlet *now*. Having towait until
after the 1.3.0
release, or be dependent on unofficial builds from the portlet-support
branch would be less ideal to say the least.
Other parties, like my own company, already have started using the Wicket
portlet-support branch, so having to delay the merge to trunk really
wouldn't be fun.
AFAICS though, the impact of merging the portlet-support to trunk won't be
big.
I had to make a few (internal) changes in the wicket core, but I don't
think those will have functional side-effects.
To make it easier for the other committers to decide if we can merge the
portlet-support to trunk now, I will create a new JIRA issue for it.
For the changes needed to the current Wicket trunk I'll create separate
patches with explanations why and attach those to that issue.
(note: most of these changes I already described in detail under subtasks
of the WICKET-647 issue).
We can then discuss these changes individually and if need be see if
alternative solutions are possible.
After those changes are reviewed and accepted, the portlet support then
can be merged to the trunk.
WDYT?
Regards,
Ate
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/Gwyn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
