http://wicket.apache.org/vision.html http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/faqs.html#FAQs-Whyaresomanymethodsfinal%253F
Martijn On 9/27/07, Sam Hough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this coding style documented anywhere? I have a vague memory that spring > pushes towards composition not extension but that is obviously not the > wicket way. > > Did the people behind javax.swing, java.util make a mistake being light with > final or is their task different? > > The Lucene people seem to make classes final presumably because extension is > not meant to be done at all. > > > > > Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > > > On 9/26/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> but this discussion is not just about getter/setters (i don't care about > >> those) > >> but also for add and remove.. then we are getting into some other stuff > > > > Yes. Getters/ setters are less tricky. Though I'm still not breaking > > in sweat when I imagine removing final on add and remove. > > > > Eelco > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/auto-dirty-and-widget-factory-tf4421187.html#a12917546 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
