no do

resource/this.getParameters()

dont try to get the RequestCylce
if it is a HEAD request (last modified check) it doesn't have to be there..

johan

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> and inside the resource you do
>
> RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getParameter("foo");
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > ok just make such a class
> >  make a (Dynamic)Resource
> >  that you add to the shared resources
> >
> >  That resource looks in the params to figure out what to serve
> >
> >  with RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference,
> ValueMap
> >  parameters) you can create urls with those params.
> >
> >  called for example by ResourceLink or Image
> >
> >
> >  johan
> >
> >
> >  On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >  > Hi Lars,
> >  >
> >  > They are not that static :)
> >  >
> >  > We import and export the images from a database we manage. By
> 'static' I
> >  > meant that the images do not change over time, so I want fixed URLs
> for
> >  > them.
> >  >
> >  > Sorry for the confusion.
> >  >
> >  > Regards,
> >  >     Erik.
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > lars vonk wrote:
> >  > > You could put Apache in front and let it serve you static images?
> >  > >
> >  > > Lars
> >  > >
> >  > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Erik van Oosten <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  > > wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >> Hi,
> >  > >>
> >  > >> I am looking for a way to serve many static images. It is
> important
> >  > that
> >  > >> I do not have to separately register them (as with
> SharedResources, as
> >  > I
> >  > >> understood) as there about 20.000 to 50.000 of them, and the set
> >  > changes
> >  > >> continuously.
> >  > >>
> >  > >> The most obvious thing that comes to mind is a static resource
> that
> >  > >> takes parameters that are extracted from the URL (similar to
> Page). But
> >  > >> I could not find such a thing.
> >  > >>
> >  > >> I am now considering implementing a servlet, but I'd rather stay
> within
> >  > >> the framework.
> >  > >>
> >  > >> Regards,
> >  > >>    Erik.
> >  > >>
> >  > >> --
> >  > >> Erik van Oosten
> >  > >> http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
> >  > >>
> >  > >>
> >  > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  > >>
> >  > >>
> >  > >>
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >
> >  >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to