Are JSR-168 portlets also affected by this? If so, is there a version of wicket and liferay that are compatible?
Many thanks Thijs :-) Thijs wrote: > > No, as described it depends on several factors > 1. my/other people's time to commit to this > 2. official release of the portlet 2 specifications > > Thijs > > Bobby Quninne schreef: >> You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will address >> JSR-268 compliance? >> >> Many thanks >> >> >> Thijs wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using >>> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of >>> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without >>> losing most of wickets functionality. >>> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket >>> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code >>> to get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything. >>> >>> Thijs >>> >>> Bobby Quninne wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with >>>> liferay 5. >>>> The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard CRUD >>>> stuff. >>>> How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> Thijs wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However >>>>> while >>>>> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues >>>>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the >>>>> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there >>>>> is >>>>> still some work to be done. They also don't support the >>>>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice >>>>> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages. >>>>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and >>>>> track it to follow the property changes >>>>> >>>>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can >>>>> track >>>>> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at >>>>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a >>>>> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base. >>>>> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so >>>>> don't get over excited just jet :). >>>>> >>>>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll >>>>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the >>>>> work >>>>> I've been doing. >>>>> >>>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit. >>>>> Thijs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> gaugat wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR >>>>>> 286) to >>>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets >>>>>> using >>>>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a >>>>>> sample >>>>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still >>>>>> issues >>>>>> with Wicket and Liferay? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17078122.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
