Hi Thijs, We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you give us the advise you offered? That would be very nice.
Thank you in advance, Benjamin On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Thijs Vonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using > com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of > javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without > losing most of wickets functionality. > I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket > working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code to > get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything. > > Thijs > > > Bobby Quninne wrote: > > > Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with > > liferay 5. The site is going to be used for backend administration, > > standard CRUD > > stuff. How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay? > > Thanks > > > > > > Thijs wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However > > > while doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues > > > regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the response > > > (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is still some > > > work to be done. They also don't support the MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT > > > feaure jet, what would be a really nice addition because of the CSS and JS > > > files wicket adds to it's pages. > > > Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and > > > track it to follow the property changes > > > > > > I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can > > > track the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait > > > at > > > least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a > > > maven > > > repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base. Besides > > > that > > > it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so don't get over > > > excited just jet :). > > > > > > I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll > > > attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work > > > I've > > > been doing. > > > > > > I hope that answers your questions a bit. > > > Thijs > > > > > > > > > gaugat wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 > > > > (JSR > > > > 286) to > > > > develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets > > > > using > > > > Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a > > > > sample > > > > wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there > > > > still > > > > issues > > > > with Wicket and Liferay? > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
