+1 Even if its one of the built in composite models, you still kind of need them for most things you do.
- Brill -----Original Message----- From: Hoover, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:59 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on generics with Wicket I read it, but I think most people will be using models more frequently than 30% of the time. Personally, I use them 99% of the time. -----Original Message----- From: Jan Kriesten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:54 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on generics with Wicket Hi William, > If you use more than one type of model for a given component I would > hardly say that it is only a fraction of the time. Do you use only one > type of model on all your components? :o) read again - I said 70% of my components don't have a Model... > The use of Void is not an obscure workaround. Why do you think they > have it? I think it's intent is very clear if you understand what void > represents. The key point is that Java generics are not runtime > generics > ;o) See above, the point is having <Void> in there for especially nothing to gain - Just make reading harder and each assignment even longer... Regards, --- Jan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
