+1 On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly what I meant with the mail to dev a week ago. So I think it's all > good. And actually could raise the wicketstuff standard. > > +1!, I guess binding since im a wicketstuff developer:) > > Jonathan Locke wrote: > >> uh, this library is of course a web site... ;-) >> >> >> Jonathan Locke wrote: >> >> >>> my RSI is bad so please forgive the terseness. the idea: >>> >>> - make an automated wicket component library >>> - define packaging structure for wicket library components - structure >>> of package would define component metadata like svn, faq, >>> help, etc (probably in meta.inf created from maven pom info by maven >>> guru) >>> - (only signed) jars could be automatically picked up by some naming >>> pattern from maven repos and deployed as live demos >>> - container would be simple to write (no db hassles... just use maven >>> and >>> packaging) >>> - everyone makes their components and demos in a standard way so we can >>> stop asking around about what functionality exists >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- > -Wicket for love > > Nino Martinez Wael > Java Specialist @ Jayway DK > http://www.jayway.dk > +45 2936 7684 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Azzeddine Daddah www.hbiloo.com
