Not much, but currently there arent such an effort.. And making it
available via an website just makes it more accessible.
John Krasnay wrote:
How would this be different than just deploying a bunch of fine-grained
JARs via Maven?
jk
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:49:06AM -0700, Jonathan Locke wrote:
my RSI is bad so please forgive the terseness. the idea:
- make an automated wicket component library
- define packaging structure for wicket library components
- structure of package would define component metadata like svn, faq, help,
etc (probably in meta.inf created from maven pom info by maven guru)
- (only signed) jars could be automatically picked up by some naming
pattern from maven repos and deployed as live demos
- container would be simple to write (no db hassles... just use maven and
packaging)
- everyone makes their components and demos in a standard way so we can
stop asking around about what functionality exists
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/idea%3A-automatic-component-repo-tp17979177p17979177.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
