Hello,
Your javascript isn't really a wicket component so you should implement
it as a behaviour then add it onto the page.
e.g. page.add (javascriptBehaviour);
This way your js code can be written into the header and if you register
the onload hook the rendering can be done automatically when the page is
viewed.
Mike
This is exactly the point. I don't want to make it appear in the markup. I
just want to call some Javascript methods by a header contribution.
Thx!
igor.vaynberg wrote:
if you dont add a div in markup where in the markup should the table
appear?
-igor
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:10 AM, burnt99
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have another component that can draw nice diagrams out of this table.
greeklinux wrote:
Hello,
what is your aimed use case for the component?
burnt99 wrote:
Hi,
I have a JavaScript component that represents a data table, so there is
nothing to visualize. However, I want to move this component to the
Java
world with Wicket. I would like to assign the component to the page
(with
.add()). But I don't want the user to add a <div> tag to the page's
HTML
file for each table, as in my opinion the HTML file is the view and as
I
have nothing visible for the table.
Cheers and thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Add-a-component-to-a-page-without-a-markup-in-the-page%27s-html-tp18356758p18357357.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
