I was planning on doing that when I saw their proposal come into the
ASF incubator.  It looks like a nice project.

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Maarten Bosteels
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone tried integrating Wicket with JSecurity ?
>
> http://www.jsecurity.org/
>
> Maarten
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:54 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You can bridge the gap between Spring Security's default URL-based
>> model and the component-based model in Wicket.  That's what we do here
>> at work.  If you want an example, let me know.  I've got one out there
>> on my public example stuff somewhere.  You could try poking around in
>> (I think it's there):
>>
>> http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-advanced/trunk
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Claus Myglegaard Vagner
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm about to start a new project using Wicket and is currently examining
>>> which security framework to apply for. I'm looking for best practices
>>> implementing security to a Wicket application.
>>>
>>> Wicket has WASP which Swarm is an implementation of and then there is
>>> wicket-auth-roles. Is wicket-auth-roles related to WASP in any way or is
>>> it a completely different security platform for wicket?
>>>
>>> Which security framework will be the future for wicket?
>>>
>>> I am thinking on using Spring Security (prior Acegi) for securing the
>>> service layer through aspects. Spring Security has build in authentication
>>> integration with various technologies like LDAP and for example a
>>> "remember me" function. I'm thinking that this project should benefit from
>>> this built in functionality, but maybe the wicket frameworks has some of
>>> the same possibilities?
>>>
>>> Well, should I integrate Spring Security to Swarm or wicket-auth-roles and
>>> what would that give me? I know that Spring Security is url based and
>>> Swarm is component based, but not sure yet that I need to specify security
>>> on the component level.
>>>
>>> Regards Claus
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to