Okay, let's keep this focused. Here is my experimental branch. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/
There is new Ajax implementation here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/js/wicket-ajax-ng.js and the main AjaxBehavior here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/AjaxBehavior.java What I'd like to hear is what exactly is wrong with it and how using jQuery (or any other framework for that matter) could improve things. -Matej On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Jörn Zaefferer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> PS: I'm currently sitting on a panel with PPK and guys from Prototype, >> Dojo, YUI and jQuery. One question was: "What library would you >> recommend but your own?". Two of the three non-jQuery guys recommened >> jQuery > > So you're saying that 75% of the leading JS framework community think > jquery is second best. > > Please keep the jquery marketing BS and fanboyism to the jquery > forums. It serves nobody any good. In fact it makes me cringe and want > to -1 any and all votes for adopting anything near jquery. > > Martijn > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
