we dont know that really if it is the respond step
And normally that getPage() isnt called in wicket when not in a Response
step
what you do is currently not supported by wicket
having an ajax behavior request to a stateless page (through a
BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget)
so i guess the fix is in processEvents is not doing this:
else if (page == null)
{
page = getPage(requestCycle);
}
but
else if (page == null)
{
page = newPage(getPageClass(), requestCycle);
}
johan
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 7:51 PM, aditsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I thought about what you said, and debugged some more. Here's what I
> found out:
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > RequestCycle.isRedirect() is right, because that is a call that tells us
> > must i redirect of i get a page redirect
> > and with ajax this is always the case.
> >
> > Problem is that the BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.getPage(RC) should only
> > create a page when it is not a redirect
> > And that also correct.
> >
>
> Actually, neither BehaviorRequestTarget nor AjaxRequestTarget ever check
> for
> redirect. As long as the target is not changed to something else, the
> redirect setting is ignored.
> AFAICT, the redirect-for-ajax thing is there so that *if* the *final*
> request target is something other than AjaxRequestTarget, it will cause a
> redirect.
> E.g. if in my handler method I set the response page to a bookmarkable
> page,
> then it should do a redirect indeed (that is, a javascript redirect, not an
> http 302).
>
> The problem is that my initial target is
> BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget, before changing to
> AjaxRequestTarget, and wicket doesn't expect that. It sees a non-ajax
> target
> for an ajax request, so it just blindly says "this is a redirect", when
> actually I'm not gonna do that.
>
> So I think isRedirect should NOT check for ajax unless it's at the RESPOND
> step. In the PROCESS_EVENTS step it should only check for the redirect
> flag.
> That would probably solve my problem and at the same time it would start to
> make sense. What do you think?
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-AJAX-links-tp20031309p20193967.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
