I will close the ticket regarding the additional constructor.
The Javadoc improvement regarding accessibility instruxtions is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1899 cheers, Steve On 28 Oct 2008, at 16:48, Michael Sparer wrote:
I always go for accessibility and each of my links do have a title and I'd be the last one to say that accessibility (and usability) isn't important. But I think the footprint of the components should be kept as small as possible. It isn't hard to extend them anyway. If you only use titled externallinks (like I do) just subclass externallink and add an abstract method to return the title. This way you're forced to come up with a decent title - which in turn improves accessibility/usability. then you're not tempted to use a default constructor ... well just my two cents - if the JIRA goes through,I'll be fine with it too :-) Michael Steve Swinsburg-2 wrote:Hi all, I've just noticed a deficiency in the ExternalLink component that doesn't allow a 'title' field to be set in its constructor. This is abasic HTML attribute that all links should have (for accessibility andexpected behaviour).Currently this is only achieved by using AttributeAppender and settingthe title attribute onto the link component. I propose a new construcotr that takes the title attribute as a parameter (or the ExternalLink set a title by default). I have filed a Jira ticket here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1878 cheers, Steve----- Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/no-title-in-ExternalLink-tp20030239p20211164.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature