Maybe would be a good idea if Wicket could report memory usage for 
non-Wicket_Components (and non-standard Java objects, like String and 
Collections) in memory. I don't know if this could ever be possible.

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Ladislav Thon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 26 de novembro de 2008 14:21
Para: users@wicket.apache.org
Assunto: Re: Wicket Session grows too big real fast


Agree. I was almost shocked :-) by Martijn's e-mail about keeping references
between pages. I believed it is a "standard" practice to keep reference to
previous page for the purpose of "cancelling", and of course do it all the
time. It seems very natural to me. O-oops.

LT

2008/11/26 Piller Sébastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I vote for such a document, too. I am now trying to reduce my session size
> too, and if I could find some hints somewhere (ie, "be extremly carefull
> with anonymous subclasses", etc) it may be a big plus.
>
> jhp a écrit :
>
>> Removing references pointing to previous pages solved a lot, very good
>> point.
>> Also making sure that individual domain objects don't get stored to
>> session
>> makes  a difference. I have still a lot of code to go through to make sure
>> that all unnecessary references don't get stored to session, but making a
>> few changes in the most important pages makes already a big difference.
>>
>> I noticed that this is a problem that others have experienced too. I guess
>> it is pretty easy unintentionally stuff the session with domain objects
>> ,and
>> if using modern day persistence framework, those domain objects can be
>> quite
>> large if they have collections etc.
>>
>> I think there is a need for small document outlining the common pitfalls
>> and
>> remedies for them. I haven't seen such. Wicket reference of course tells
>> about LoadableDetachableModel, but this thread has info that I haven't
>> found
>> anywhere else. I might try compose such a document, if I just have the
>> time
>> and energy in the near future.
>>
>> Thanks to Martijn, Johan and John for your responses!
>>
>> BR,
>> Jukka
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
***************************************************************************************************
"Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s) destinatários(s) 
acima identificado(s),
podendo conter informações e/ou documentos confidencias/privilegiados e seu 
sigilo é protegido por 
lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o remetente e 
apague-a de seu sistema.
Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação, distribuição, 
cópia ou uso sem 
expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente não refletem, 
necessariamente, 
o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas autorizadas."


"Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees above 
identified, possibly 
containing information and or privileged/confidential documents whose content 
is protected by law. 
In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender and delete it 
from your system. 
Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination, distribution, 
copy or use without 
express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the sender do not 
necessarily reflect 
CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized personnel."
***************************************************************************************************


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to