Martijn,

Looking in the maven repo, it looks like there is also a version
1.4-SNAPSHOT of wicket-security. It has a build date of Nov 2008.
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket-security/swarm/1.4-SNAPSHOT

It looks like the following might be the source.  But these commits
are 7 months old (committed by mrmean), which doesn't match the Nov
2008 date in maven repo.  It does have the comment "initial
compilation against wicket 1.4 (no generics yet)".
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-security-1.4-earlyaccess/

The wiki page clarifies that 1.3.0 is the latest stable release and
that 1.3-SNAPSHOT is the 1.3.1 branch.  The source for the 1.3.1
branch looks to be in:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-security/

So perhaps there has already been some work done on porting
wicket-security to 1.4.  If you have any additional information,
please share it!

Thanks,
Tauren


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Tauren Mills <tau...@groovee.com> wrote:
> Martijn,
>
> I'm in the planning and estimating stages for this project, so no I
> haven't tried it out.  I was hoping to hear from someone who has to
> help give me an idea of how much effort will be involved.  Of course,
> I will be giving it a try as well, I just haven't yet.
>
> Thanks!
> Tauren
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Our company is quite invested in swarm/wasp (Maurice was a friend and
>> co-worker). Our current projects are still 1.3 based, and several
>> swarm/wasp based projects will move to wicket 1.4 as it becomes final.
>> Chances are we'll need to fix swarm/wasp as well, and invest into that
>> when that happens.
>>
>> What doesn't work with swarm/wasp in wicket 1.4? Did you try it out?
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Tauren Mills <tau...@groovee.com> wrote:
>>> Jeremy,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the response.  I apologize for touching on a sensitive
>>> subject like this, but I was unaware of the circumstances.  My
>>> condolences to anyone who knew Maurice.
>>>
>>> It really does look like Wicket-security, and in particular version
>>> 1.3.1 might be the right solution for my application.  Are there
>>> people out there who are using it in your applications?  Do you have
>>> any plans for how to migrate to wicket 1.4, or have you already
>>> attempted doing so?  How much effort was involved?
>>>
>>> I wouldn't mind helping move wicket security forward, but I'm not sure
>>> if I have the technical expertise to lead the project.  I'm somewhat
>>> proficient with wicket 1.3, but am still just dabbling with 1.4.
>>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>> Tauren
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
>>> <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>>>> I think since Maurice's death, there has not been much concrete discussion
>>>> as to the future of it.  I suppose it needs a leader to pick it up and run
>>>> with it (and I nominate Nino :)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Future-of-Wicket-Security--td19176506.html
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/In-memoriam:-Maurice-Marrink-td18813738.html
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jeremy Thomerson
>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Tauren Mills <tau...@groovee.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know the current status of the wicket-security project?
>>>>> It looks like there has been no activity in svn for close to a year.
>>>>> And it is unclear if it will work with wicket 1.4.  What is the
>>>>> preferred tool today for implementing a roles-based authorization and
>>>>> authentication system with wicket 1.4?
>>>>>
>>>>> Right now I only need wicket-based security, but may need to secure
>>>>> webservices as well in the future, and understand that swarm 1.3.1 was
>>>>> working to add that. In my application, users will be assigned
>>>>> multiple roles.  All users will see the same "main page", but users
>>>>> with certain roles need to be able to see additional tabs, more
>>>>> content panels, as well as be able to view and edit appropriate
>>>>> content based on roles.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I'm trying to determine a security implementation for an upcoming
>>>>> project and have been researching the options available.  I've found
>>>>> the following approaches:
>>>>>
>>>>> Wicket Auth Roles
>>>>> wicket-auth-roles-1.4-rc2.jar
>>>>> Roles support seems quite limited
>>>>>
>>>>> Wicket Security (SWARM and WASP)
>>>>> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security
>>>>> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security+1.3.1
>>>>> Looks powerful, but not sure if it works with 1.4 and if support is
>>>>> going to continue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wicket Security + ACEGI
>>>>> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Swarm+and+Acegi+HowTo
>>>>> Not sure about this one
>>>>>
>>>>> Wicket Auth Roles plus Spring Security
>>>>> Example: http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-advanced/trunk/
>>>>> Looks clean and simple, but I thought I read spring security was very
>>>>> much based on the RESTfulness of things, which doesn't necessarily
>>>>> work all that well with wicket.  Never used it, so maybe I'm mistaken.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wicket in Action book
>>>>> Uses a simple, but custom implementation.  I would consider going with
>>>>> a custom solution too if the other options don't pan out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any other solutions I don't know about?  I'm all ears if anyone has
>>>>> recommendations for my use case.  I'm leaning toward wicket security,
>>>>> but am concerned about the lack of activity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Tauren
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to