I used a PropertyModel. Now i use my own extended PropertyModel which
overrides the setObject-Method quite similar to your proposal.
Thanks for the Help.
reiern70 wrote:
>
> What kind of model are you attaching to a the text field? Anyway, you
> could
> always do:
>
> public class EmptyStringModel extend WhatEverModelYouAreUsing<String> {
>
> .....Constructors....
>
> public void setObject(String value) {
> if(value != null) {
> super.setObject(value);
> } else {
> super.setObject("");
> }
> }
> }
>
> and use EmptyStringModel instead of the one you are using now?
>
> Best
>
> Ernesto
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:21 AM, SantiagoA <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I have a TextField with some input.
>> If a user deletes the input and submit the setter sets the value to
>> "NULL".
>> How can i avoid this behavior and force an empty String "" to bet set?
>>
>> Thanks for any help!
>> Santiago
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/how-to-avoid-value-set-to-null-if-value-of-textfield-gets-deleted-tp22198221p22198221.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-to-avoid-value-set-to-null-if-value-of-textfield-gets-deleted-tp22198221p22203068.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
