If you retrieve the string using getModelObjectAsString() you will never receive a null, because that method converts nulls to ""
SantiagoA wrote: > > A null value won´t work for me, because I have to Map these values via > Castor to XML and as result null values were deleted in Castor. > At this point I need an empty String to make sure the value is mapped in > Castor. > > Thanks for the proposal anyway, > the solution above (Ernestos proposal) works fine for me! > > > > jensiator wrote: >> >> My experience is that null values a nice to use. What if you have a >> optional email field? When the user starts to write something the email >> validation kicks in. I think a lot of wickets validators uses Null in >> that case. And I have used that i JSP/Struts programming to. I think its >> better to handle the null values when you later use the model to do >> something. >> >> Jens Alenius >> >> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-avoid-value-set-to-null-if-value-of-textfield-gets-deleted-tp22198221p22204778.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
