Yep, I agree - please feel free to contribute. We might want to hold off on the name change though. There *might* be a name discrepancy with ki and another project in the interwebs. We're still waiting on what we should do per the project Mentors after they come back from Apache Con, where they're currently discussing the situation with other ASF members.
Regards, Les On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Maarten Bosteels <mbosteels....@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > I added you to the Project Members, so feel free to commit your examples. > Unfortunately, until now I haven't had time to work on it myself > > The idea was to let the code mature in > http://code.google.com/p/wicket-jsecurity/ > and maybe move it to wicket-stuff later on. > > Maybe we should move it to wicket-stuff already. > My main problem with wicket-stuff is/was that it's not always very clear > which projects are still alive and maintained and which are practically > dead. And at the time, wicket-stuff had some problems with continuous > integration, IIRC. > > Les, what do you think ? > We should change the project name to wicket-ki anyway. > > regards, > Maarten > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:47 AM, nino martinez wael < > nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah I've for one always been very pro for wicketstuff.. It's nice > keeping > > things in one place.. Plus as you write if we share a somewhat similar > > structure it's potentially easier to maintain.. > > > > 2009/3/24 Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> > > > > > Hi- > > > > > > I've been looking to integrate a complex security model with wicket -- > > > jsecurity seems really good. I tried messing with: > > > http://code.google.com/p/wicket-jsecurity/ > > > > > > This appears to be a starting place, but does not have any running > > example. > > > > > > In an effort to get things running (and learn JSecurity) i took that + > > > wicket-auth-roles and tried to make a functioning core + example. I've > > got > > > something running and would love to share it... > > > > > > Should I post this to the google code site? > > > > > > It makes more sense (to me) if we keep it in the wicketstuff repos -- > > that > > > way we get the benefit of Jeremy's work to make wickettuff-core much > > > cleaner. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Ryan > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
