Tonio, what are the wicket/liferay versions that you are using?
My problem with filtermapping and porltet names are currently registered in liferay's JIRA You can take a look at: http://issues.liferay.com/browse/LPS-1911 But anyway, its working :) ! My fear right now is about using all wicket's features as a portlet. I need to know if there is any real world case of wicket apps as portlets. If there is, if uses a wide range of wicket's components and features... Knowing that, i'ĺl fell more safe to use wicket as my standard framework for portlets development in Liferay 5 (5.2). (sorry for the bad english :)) thanks ! Bruno 2009/5/11 Tonio Caputo <ton...@exeo.com.ar> > Bruno, > > Well that is a surprise for me, this is my web file > > <filter-mapping> > <filter-name>kmkApplication</filter-name> > <url-pattern>/kmk/*</url-pattern> > <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher> > <dispatcher>INCLUDE</dispatcher> > <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher> > </filter-mapping> > > and my portlet file > > <portlet-name>kmkApplication</portlet-name> > <init-param> > <name>wicketFilterPath</name> > <value>/kmk</value> > </init-param> > <supports> > > and it works pretty well :) > > I remember another thing, while I was pasting this XML don't use > * for the *supports* tag, I begin writting something like > <supports> > <mime-type>*/*</mime-type> > <portlet-mode>VIEW</portlet-mode> > <portlet-mode>EDIT</portlet-mode> > </supports> > > and finally need to put at least two items with mime-types *"text/html"* > and > *"text/xml"* > if not it won't work. > > The important thing is just to get it working, hope it helps > tonio > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Bruno Ledesma <led.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Well, its kind of curious... the 2nd issue that you posted: > > > > 2). Never call your appl/portlet-name with the same name > > as the url-mapping. > > > > In fact, I was not able to see my portlet if the portlet name and > > filter-mapping are differents. > > > > Just to confirm , when you say URL Mapping do you mean...? > > > > <filter-mapping> > > <filter-name>wickportlet</filter-name> > > <url-pattern>/wickportlet/*</url-pattern> > > <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher> > > <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher> > > <dispatcher>INCLUDE</dispatcher> > > </filter-mapping> > > > > I had to put a url-pattern equal to the portlet name, and without any > > different char (like '-'). > > > > The first issue, i didn't knew nothing about it. > > > > thanks! > > > > Bruno Ledesma > > > > 2009/5/11 Tonio Caputo <ton...@exeo.com.ar> > > > > > Hi Bruno, > > > > > > I'm a beginner in wicket, also in liferay and was able to > > > use wicket to construct a portlet. > > > > > > My first experience was a bit tough, a lot of minor problems > > > Take a look at all the things find in the internet, I was trying to > > > make a simple doc with all the issues but I was not able. > > > > > > The 2 most important things I remember: > > > > > > 1). Add to your portal-ext.properties this line > > > portlet.container.impl=sun > > > > > > 2). Never call your appl/portlet-name with the same name > > > as the url-mapping. > > > > > > Hope this helps > > > tonio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Bruno Ledesma <led.br...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Everyone! > > > > > > > > Im currently developing portlets with Wicket 1.4-rc2 and liferay 5.2 > . > > > They > > > > have some compatibility issues (portlet names must be equal the > wicket > > > > filter-mappings). Does anyone know anyother issues? I saw in liferay > > > foruns > > > > some guys that are developing portlets (in liferay) with wicket, but > i > > > dont > > > > know if they handled compatibilty issues changing some wicket or > > liferay > > > > code... > > > > > > > > If someone that did this kind of job, it would be great to have some > > > > feedback! > > > > > > > > thanks ! > > > > > > > > Bruno Ledesma > > > > > > > > > >
