Hi dearfirst of all, why add another dependency,just for conversation handling, while we have in wicket a strong ground for it note: jsr299 is a big spec with a somehow complex lifecycle(which may not be compatible with that of wicket) and really complicated bean resolution strategy
second: wicket components are not 299 beans, wicket is an unmanaged framework , u must create the components urself, not by the framework, which is a requirement for jsr299 what can be done with web beans, is to inject its objects in wicket components BUT u cannot manage wicket components as web beans , and for example inject them or handle there lifecycle Joe On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:43 AM, janneru <jan.ne...@googlemail.com> wrote: > hi james&joe, > > which are the issues with clint popetz's current work on the > webbeans-wicket > integration (already contained in the webbeans preview) that you would > write > your own? > > cheers, uwe. > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:05 PM, James Carman > <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > > > JSR-299 is somewhat of a moving target right now, so it's hard to stay > > up-to-date with it. I'm mainly working with the OpenWebBeans folks on > > it. > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Joe Fawzy <joewic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:44 AM, James Carman > > > <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Igor Vaynberg < > > igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > you are free to implement this as an open source addition to > wicket. > > > > > there is wicketstuff or googlecode or sf.net where you can host > it. > > > > > > > > > > wicket is a ui framework and conversational scope management falls > > > > > outside wicket's scope. it is our job to provide the hooks to make > > > > > such things possible, not to provide an implementation. > > > > > > > > And, those hooks are very nice. I would only ask for some more > > > > listener registering opportunities (like for listening to request > > > > cycle events like begin/end rather than having to implement your own > > > > request cycle). > > > > > > > > > Yes this is a much needed functionality > > > i think we may cooperate in that thing > > > can u start another mail discussion suggesting ur needs , and make > > everyone > > > participate > > > Thanks > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > >
