Thanks - I added problem report WICKET-2518
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2518
Attached is a patch for Application_bg.properties file with properly
encoded bg translations
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
we are fine with .properties or .properties.xml. its all good.
-igor
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Olivier Bourgeois
<olivier.bourgeois....@gmail.com> wrote:
The advantage of UTF-8 vs ASCII is that the translators can directly
read/write the property files without transcoding them, so I think it's
better to go with XML (and less risky).
But I don't know what the Wicket dev team prefer for Wicket default property
files.
2009/10/12 Girts Ziemelis <girts.zieme...@gmail.com>
Olivier Bourgeois wrote:
I'm using BG translations for my app, but not the Wicket default ones, and
I
am using a mix of UTF-8 properties files and XML files. I just had a look
with wicket 1.4.2 and the BG translations are broken : I think something
went wrong with the native2ascii transformation.
If you look at the history of the Wicket BG translation file, it used to
be
in UTF-8, but because Java properties does not hold UTF-8 it has been
encoded in ASCII. Now that Wicket 1.4.x can work with XML properties. I
think this file should be in XML, like RU file is today.
Yes - our BG translations from our property files also work fine - it is
just the wicket standard messages.
Ok, I will try to get the old translations back and encode them properly.
It seems they are wrong since may 2006 :(
Or is it really preferred to store them in XML? Currently russian is the
only one in XML.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
