you guys are missing the point. Bindgen is a *standard apt processor*. it is not an eclipse plugin. all major IDEs have support for annotation processors baked in.
refactoring support is definetely *possible*, but it would require an actual IDE pliugin. -igor On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Martin Makundi <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > Ah.. the next big thing, (in) refactoring (bindings?)!!! All glory to > the person that does it. > > ** > Martin > > 2009/11/26 Johan Compagner <jcompag...@gmail.com>: >> http://help.eclipse.org/help32/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/reference/api/org/eclipse/ltk/core/refactoring/participants/package-summary.html >> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 13:52, James Carman >> <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >> >>> Refactoring could definitely be supported in IDEA. With the Hibernate >>> support, when you change a property name it will change your mapping >>> hbm.xml (yes, we still use them) files for you automatically. Same >>> thing happens with the Spring support. The configuration files are >>> changed for you. I don't know how eclipse works with this kind of >>> stuff, but IDEA definitely has hooks for this kind of stuff. >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Martin Makundi >>> <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: >>> > If refactoring is not supported it is just easier to use string >>> > constants, which do not break. >>> > >>> > ** >>> > Martin >>> > >>> > 2009/11/26 Gerolf Seitz <gerolf.se...@gmail.com>: >>> >> as far as i have read, the binding "methods" aren't automatically >>> refactored >>> >> (eg. renamed), >>> >> but you get compiler errors in the code where you use the "old names". >>> so it >>> >> should be >>> >> fairly easy to fix your own code (in contrast to some strings) >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian < >>> >> christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Is refactoring available for bindgen? >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> >>> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] >>> >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:56 >>> >>> An: users@wicket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> Betreff: PropertyModels *without* strings >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://wicketinaction.com/2009/11/removing-fragile-string-expressions-from-wicket-code/ >>> >>> >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> > >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
