Do you mean this post? http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/HowToStartLearningJavaEE6
Ernesto On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Joseph Pachod <[email protected]> wrote: > Lester Chua wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am facing a hurdle that need crossing in my final attempt to push Wicket >> for use in an organization. >> I have: >> >> 1) Prototyped a small size module >> 2) Did 2-3 presentations on the key features and advantages of wicket >> >> No one is disputing my claims about productivity and good OO code that was >> the result. >> >> BUT, the technology evaluation committee is NOT recommending Wicket >> because of..... of all things..... >> - Wicket's Low Adoption Rate!!!! >> Can I find any numbers to blow this away? >> >> My alternative is to accept the finding and work with Struts 2. Which will >> mean the stack will need to expand to DWR >> (for security). I REALLY don't want to go there, and am even considering >> not taking part in this project due to the high risk involved, only 9 months >> to introduce huge changes to a system that has lots of legacy problems (took >> about 3 years to build). I think a lot of those years were spent wrestling >> with the monster that is EJB 1.1. The only way I thought the project can >> even be on time is to scrap the entire presentation layer (aka Struts) and >> redo it in Wicket with 1 dedicated developer while the rest of the team work >> on killing the beast that is EJB 1.1 by refactoring the biz code. >> >> Sigh, my choices are stark. It's either to keep the job and plough ahead >> and probably fail spectacularly 9 months later or go hungry and explain to >> my wife why we need to spend less on the kid...... >> >> It's easy to blame the tech committee but they did help me find wicket by >> rejecting my initial proposal to build the new system on a >> (JQuery+JSON+REST) framework, which can be very productive as well, if not >> as "clean" as Wicket. >> >> Sorry for rambling so much. Is there any way I can demolish the silly low >> adoption rate argument (omg I still don't believe it can be so lame)? >> >> Lester >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> Hi Lester > > Did you point out that someone like Gavin King recommends wicket (and hence > the Seam support for it) ? > > It may help to convince about wicket's credibility. > > hope it helps > ++ > > -- > Joseph Pachod > IT > > THOMAS DAILY GmbH > Adlerstraße 19 > 79098 Freiburg > Deutschland > T + 49 761 3 85 59 310 > F + 49 761 3 85 59 550 > E [email protected] > www.thomas-daily.de > > Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors: > Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig > Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947 > > Registrieren Sie sich unter www.signin.thomas-daily.de für die > kostenfreien TD Morning News, eine Auswahl aktueller Themen des Tages > morgens um 9:00 in Ihrer Mailbox. > > Hinweis: Der Redaktionsschluss für unsere TD Morning News ist täglich um > 8:30 Uhr. Es werden vorrangig Informationen berücksichtigt, die nach 16:00 > Uhr des Vortages eingegangen sind. Die Email-Adresse unserer Redaktion > lautet [email protected]. > > To receive the free TD News International - a selection of the day's top > issues delivered to your mail box every day - please register at > www.signin.thomas-daily.de > > Please note: Information received for our TD News International after 4 > p.m. will be given priority for publication the following day. The daily > editorial deadline is 8:30 a.m. You can reach our editorial staff at > [email protected]. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
