Struts Club?! That's disgusting :-(
Am 11.01.2010 um 22:57 schrieb Jonathan Locke: > > > that's because it's the number one rule! nobody talks about Struts Club. > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: >> >> here is an interesting tidbit >> >> wicket is on the front page of nabble >> >> http://old.nabble.com/ >> >> sorted by activity. we are there along maven, jquery, cxf, tomcat, >> etc. how is the adoption on those? >> >> -igor >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Lester Chua <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Thanks for the links. >>> I have already submitted them as part of the evaluation process. >>> >>> I'll take a look at the IBM links from scott. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Lester >>> >>> Steve Swinsburg wrote: >>>> >>>> On the wiki there are some pages to help your cause: >>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/websites-based-on-wicket.html >>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/products-based-on-wicket.html >>>> >>>> as well as blogs talking about Wicket, and lots more useful PR info: >>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/index.html >>>> >>>> All the best! >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/01/2010, at 11:43 AM, Lester Chua wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I am facing a hurdle that need crossing in my final attempt to push >>>>> Wicket for use in an organization. >>>>> I have: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Prototyped a small size module >>>>> 2) Did 2-3 presentations on the key features and advantages of wicket >>>>> >>>>> No one is disputing my claims about productivity and good OO code that >>>>> was the result. >>>>> >>>>> BUT, the technology evaluation committee is NOT recommending Wicket >>>>> because of..... of all things..... >>>>> - Wicket's Low Adoption Rate!!!! >>>>> Can I find any numbers to blow this away? >>>>> >>>>> My alternative is to accept the finding and work with Struts 2. Which >>>>> will mean the stack will need to expand to DWR >>>>> (for security). I REALLY don't want to go there, and am even >>>>> considering >>>>> not taking part in this project due to the high risk involved, only 9 >>>>> months >>>>> to introduce huge changes to a system that has lots of legacy problems >>>>> (took >>>>> about 3 years to build). I think a lot of those years were spent >>>>> wrestling >>>>> with the monster that is EJB 1.1. The only way I thought the project >>>>> can >>>>> even be on time is to scrap the entire presentation layer (aka Struts) >>>>> and >>>>> redo it in Wicket with 1 dedicated developer while the rest of the team >>>>> work >>>>> on killing the beast that is EJB 1.1 by refactoring the biz code. >>>>> >>>>> Sigh, my choices are stark. It's either to keep the job and plough >>>>> ahead >>>>> and probably fail spectacularly 9 months later or go hungry and explain >>>>> to >>>>> my wife why we need to spend less on the kid...... >>>>> >>>>> It's easy to blame the tech committee but they did help me find wicket >>>>> by >>>>> rejecting my initial proposal to build the new system on a >>>>> (JQuery+JSON+REST) framework, which can be very productive as well, if >>>>> not >>>>> as "clean" as Wicket. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for rambling so much. Is there any way I can demolish the silly >>>>> low >>>>> adoption rate argument (omg I still don't believe it can be so lame)? >>>>> >>>>> Lester >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Help-with-Wicket-Adoption-Numbers-tp27069702p27118513.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
