Yeah - and although I haven't confirmed it myself, I have been told that all dates are actually stored as 0's and 1's - and that must be why there was such a fuss in 2000 - too many zeroes and not enough ones - or something like that.
:) -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:00 PM, James Carman <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > All data in Java is ultimately stored as some sort of primitive type. > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Jonathan Locke > <jonathan.lo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > TimeUnit is icky and storing time values in primitive types is a bad > idea. > > > > > > Alexandru Objelean wrote: > >> > >> I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java > >> provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate > >> this > >> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit? > >> > >> Alex Objelean > >> > >> > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
