I was misinformed. I stand corrected! :) On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: > i thought they were all stored as electrons.... > > -igor > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, James Carman > <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: >> All data in Java is ultimately stored as some sort of primitive type. >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Jonathan Locke >> <jonathan.lo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> TimeUnit is icky and storing time values in primitive types is a bad idea. >>> >>> >>> Alexandru Objelean wrote: >>>> >>>> I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java >>>> provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate >>>> this >>>> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit? >>>> >>>> Alex Objelean >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html >>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
